Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Truth Bombs

Rush Limbaugh's 'N.F.ail'

bgraham2@uccs.edu

Published: Thursday, October 22, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 15:03

Over the past few weeks, radio personality, oxycontin enthusiast and blowhard extraordinaire Rush Limbaugh has flirted with the idea of professional football team ownership. In a group investment bid led by St. Louis Blues owner Dave Checketts, Limbaugh's name was included on a list of interested parties vying for the 929 million dollar franchise.

Limbaugh's involvement sparked an inferno of reactionary opining in seemingly every news publication, from ESPN to MSNBC to Vibe magazine, with critics citing some of Limbaugh's racially inflammatory sound bytes of note, particularly those concerning the NFL, as evidence that he was far from an ideal candidate. For the record, Fox News, and Bill O'Reilly in particular, thinks Rush's dismissal by his own business partners "... is real 1984 thought-police stuff."

One such Rush Limbaugh quote, the most demonstrative of his real attitudes in my reckoning, is selected from a June 2007 episode of The Rush Limbaugh Show. He remarked, "The NFL looks all too often like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

One of Limbaugh's most favored counter arguments is that his critics take incendiary quotes from his broadcasts out of context, so I went to a conservative blog and read the transcript of the  full episode with the quote in question, posted under the auspices of absolving the host by grounding his careless statement in the guttural bog of Limbaughian rhetoric.

What I discovered is that Rush tagged that punchline onto the tail end of a meandering tirade about the rambunctious on-field behavior of today's gridiron heroes. I was actually struck by how little Rush's rant had to do with racial politics until those closing lines, but then the insidious intent behind the diatribe crystallized in my mind.

Perhaps it's incidental that Limbaugh laments the decline of good ol' boy culture in American football as the sport grows increasingly dominated by African American athletes, but Limbaugh's catalogue of racial controversy betrays his prejudices. As I don't know Mr. Limbaugh personally, I cannot attest to whether or not he is a racist, but he does indeed provide a radio airwave haven for angry racists: three hours a day, five days a week.

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, whom, according to Limbaugh, owed his career success to affirmative action (statements that led to the termination of Limbaugh's short stint as a sports analyst), was among the chorus of voices joining to protest Limbaugh's further involvement in the NFL. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, as well as Colts owner Jim Irsay, also voiced their reluctance to approve Limbaugh's bid. The Reverend Al Sharpton lended his oddly hypnotic speechifying and slick Gheri curl to the outcry.

After days of heated speculation and cable news pontificating, Limbaugh was dropped by the Checketts group in an effort to secure their purchase. Consequently, Rush has taken to the airwaves, bloviating about his victimization by the media in "Obama's America," and how his free speech has been infringed.

What Limbaugh and his supporters fail to understand, however, is that while Limbaugh is certainly free to promulgate race-baiting vitriol at will, so too are those offended by his statements allowed to air their grievances. So too are his investor friends allowed to remove him from their proposal.

It sounds like the free market at work to me. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments Log in to Comment

Casey Hays
Fri Oct 23 2009 22:10
Mr. Graham, you showed a glimmer of hope that maybe a journalist was going to do actual journalism by going back and reviewing Rush Limbaugh's actual quotes. In doing so, you beat CNN personality Rick Sanchez, and an army of ESPN commentators. This lack of integrity in the media is why someone without even a college degree has been successful on the air for 20 years, unmatched by even the most educated of liberal journalists. Maybe you could be that journalist?

Unfortunately, after briefly realizing the utter lack of racism in his comments, it dawned on you that he must be a racist anyways. After 20 years of talking - live, unscripted, unedited, for three hours a day, five days a week - your smoking gun of his racism is that surely, if he mentioned the Bloods and Crips with regards to America's most beloved and talked about sport, he must mean it racially? Your Gheri curl comment can be construed as more racist than that.

Then you almost lower yourself to Sanchez's level completely by attributing an idea to Limbaugh that never existed - that McNabb owes his success to affirmative action. That's not what he said at all. Not even close. He said that the NFL and the media were hyping him up because they were embarrassed about the lack of black QBs and coaches, so they wanted to overplay what success he had.

As for the Checketts group, you're correct that is has every right to include or exclude whoever they want, as does the NFL, but no one is saying the government should step in and make them give ownership to Limbaugh. What you didn't mention though that's extremely relevent to that portion of the story is that Checkett came to Limbaugh and asked him to be part of the group and Limbaugh at first declined, insisting his enemies would find him too controversial a figure to be an NFL owner. Checkett persisted over Limbaugh's reservations that they could withstand the heat, and only then did Limbaugh accept. Then they booted him in spite of their beliefs that Limbaugh was innocent of all charges.

People who want to see racism within Rush's comments do so because they want to believe that people who disagree with their ideas must be evil. Even when they look for it though, they can't find it. You couldn't, so like them, you assumed facts into history, and proclaimed him guilty of race-baiting. In order to do that, you yourself had to become a racist; Limbaugh didn't see black people in gangs, you did. Rush has black people on his show all the time. Tony Dungy alone was on his show twice last year. Rush doesn't point it out. That's because Rush doesn't see black people, he sees people. You see black. He sees Americans - nothing more, nothing less. That's how we should all be. That's Dr. King's dream. It isn't going to happen though as long as we're inferring racism where there is none, just because we happen to not like the guy.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In